We do not know exactly how much Iran can really destroy, because regardless if they can or they cannot destroy more, their current strategy of threatening to destroy much more than they have destroyed is the correct strategy.
If they had destroyed everything they can, then the adversaries would have no reason of further restraint. As it is, the adversaries are still fearful of greater retaliation, which has forced them to enter negotiations.
Also the fact that the Americans are not attacking "anything", is only partially true.
Of course, the Americans could destroy much more, but they have already destroyed many civilian targets, including the oil exporting infrastructure, bridges, rail stations, etc., in some cases also taking care to hit again the first responders.
The only trick is Hormuz strait blocking by Iran... and it's very hard to tackle without a land invasion which Trump is reluctant to execute. Nothing else Iran could possibly do, matters at all.
> Nothing else Iran could possibly do, matters at all.
This is a naive belief and contains the same hubris as Trump held when entering this war.
They have also destroyed billing of US military planes and radars on the ground, taken US company data centers in the region offline, and damaged refineries for oil, aluminum, and water (desalination).
They can still get missiles and drones through air defenses in the region. 80% of their strikes are against not Israel.
Are you calling for genocide like Trump? There's a difference between Iran, Iranians, and the IRGC. History also shows that bombing does not remove regimes nor gets people to rise up. Trump promised to show up if they tried, they did and he didn't hold up his end of the deal (to the surprise of no one).
