A crime drop between over that 3 months is not, as evidenced by the subsequent r... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		esbranson 5 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: US cities are axing Flock Safety surveillance tech... A crime drop between over that 3 months is not, as evidenced by the subsequent rise for 3 months after, of the time period you claim as evidence.

		help

ceejayoz 5 days ago [–]

The drop starting a year before the cameras is evidence that the drop is not explicable via the cameras.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact